Report an error
Popularity of the first name Scarlett correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Electricity generation in Equatorial Guinea | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Tanzania | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.99 | 12yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Niger | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in Maldives | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
| London Gold Prices | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Robberies in North Dakota | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
| US production of cheese (other than cottage cheese) | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
| Dominion Energy's stock price (D) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| Number of internet users | r=0.95 | 24yrs | No |
| General Mills' stock price (GIS) | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'drake' meme | r=0.93 | 17yrs | No |
| Patents granted in the US | r=0.93 | 46yrs | No |
| The price of gold | r=0.92 | 40yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Scarlett also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)