Report an error
Total number of passenger vehicles sold in China correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Points scored by the Cincinnati Bengals | r=0.94 | 7yrs | No |
The number of university physics teachers in Massachusetts | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with HP | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Google searches for 'delorean' | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in North Korea | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
The number of private detectives in Nevada | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
Wins for the Atlanta Braves | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
Wins for the Atlanta Braves | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
US household spending on telephone services | r=0.88 | 7yrs | No |
The number of college psychology teachers in Florida | r=0.86 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Robert De Niro appeared in | r=0.85 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Ryan Gosling appeared in | r=0.84 | 7yrs | No |
The number of outdoor power equipment mechanics in Delaware | r=0.81 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Dwayne Johnson appeared in | r=0.79 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Al Pacino appeared in | r=0.78 | 7yrs | No |
Total number of passenger vehicles sold in China also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)