Report an error
Popularity of the first name Marcel correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of computer network architects in Georgia | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| PepsiCo's stock price (PEP) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to go to space' | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.94 | 15yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.94 | 16yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
| US milk fat used to produce cheese (excluding cottage cheese) | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to move to europe' | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
| xkcd comics published about experiments | r=0.86 | 16yrs | No |
| Bank of Montreal's stock price (BMO) | r=0.84 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marcel also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)