Report an error
Popularity of the first name Mohamed correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.99 | 39yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Saint Lucia | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
US kids in public school | r=0.96 | 33yrs | No |
Electricity generation in South Africa | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Brazil | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.95 | 48yrs | No |
Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.94 | 43yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.91 | 48yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Arizona | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.63 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mohamed also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)