Report an error
Total Sales at Clothing and Accessories Stores correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Electricity generation in Argentina | r=0.97 | 30yrs | No |
Inflation in the US | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ruby | r=0.95 | 31yrs | No |
Total number of automotive recalls | r=0.94 | 31yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.94 | 30yrs | No |
Annual comic book sales in North America | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Lionel Messi's goal count for Argentina | r=0.73 | 17yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Scarlett Johansson appeared in | r=0.5 | 29yrs | No |
Total Sales at Clothing and Accessories Stores also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)