Report an error
Popularity of the first name Sonya correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of data entry keyers in Minnesota | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
United States music album sales | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.94 | 32yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Arkansas | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
Burglaries in New York | r=0.92 | 38yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.92 | 36yrs | No |
Air pollution in New York City | r=0.9 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sonya also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)