Report an error
Popularity of the first name London correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of civil engineers in Louisiana | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Occidental Petroleum's stock price (OXY) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Norway | r=0.9 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'Taylor Swift' | r=0.82 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name London also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)