Report an error
Popularity of the first name River correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| Monster Beverage's stock price (MNST) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA | r=0.95 | 48yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'when is new years' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name River also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)