Report an error
Popularity of the first name Jonas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Jet fuel used in Former Czechoslovakia | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Australia | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Texas | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.81 | 44yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.78 | 48yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.74 | 43yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.73 | 48yrs | No |
The number of movies Meryl Streep appeared in | r=0.73 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jonas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)