Report an error
Popularity of the first name Bennett correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Electricity generation in Sudan | r=1 | 42yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Vietnam | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Biomass power generated in El Salvador | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| The number of physical therapists in California | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Patents granted in the US | r=0.96 | 46yrs | No |
| The number of pharmacy technicians in New York | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Apple's annual net income | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bennett also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)