Report an error
Number of turnovers by Chris Paul in the Regular NBA season correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total comments on PBS Space Time YouTube videos | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'harambe' meme | r=0.84 | 7yrs | No |
The number of exercise physiologists in Oregon | r=0.84 | 11yrs | No |
The number of nurse anesthetists in Alabama | r=0.82 | 11yrs | No |
The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Texas | r=0.78 | 17yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Afghanistan | r=0.77 | 16yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Gambia | r=0.69 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Wind power generated in Fiji | r=0.64 | 15yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about pop culture | r=0.59 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Shaina | r=0.51 | 17yrs | No |
Number of turnovers by Chris Paul in the Regular NBA season also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)