Report an error
Popularity of the first name Zoey correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Thailand | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Biomass power generated in Belgium | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'google' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in North Carolina | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Connecticut | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Rhode Island | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Virginia | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Maryland | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in South Dakota | r=0.91 | 46yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Georgia | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Montana | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Utah | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Taylor Swift' | r=0.73 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zoey also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)