Report an error
Annual count of part-time employees in the United States correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Petroluem consumption in Australia | r=0.96 | 33yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Kuwait | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Branson | r=0.96 | 33yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.94 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.91 | 33yrs | No |
Number of public school students in Kindergarten | r=0.91 | 33yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Kansas | r=0.81 | 32yrs | No |
Google searches for 'batman' | r=0.7 | 19yrs | No |
Arson in Oregon | r=-0.93 | 33yrs | No |
Annual count of part-time employees in the United States also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)