Report an error
Popularity of the first name Katarina correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The marriage rate in Tennessee | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
US household spending on books | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
The number of locker room attendants in Indiana | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
The number of sewing machine operators in Kentucky | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Panama Canal' | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
Carjackings in the US | r=0.91 | 27yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Portugal | r=0.89 | 43yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in United Kingdom | r=0.88 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Katarina also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)