Report an error
Popularity of the first name Ellie correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Fossil fuel use in Sao Tome and Principe | r=1 | 42yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in Algeria | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.99 | 19yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System | r=0.96 | 48yrs | No |
| The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Cameroon | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| Dollar Tree's stock price (DLTR) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Total budget of Marvel comic-based films released | r=0.86 | 35yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'funny cat videos' | r=0.81 | 19yrs | No |
| UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count | r=0.79 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ellie also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)