Report an error
Global Permanent Nuclear Reactor Shutdowns correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Tennessee | r=0.89 | 6yrs | No |
| Votes for Republican Senators in Rhode Island | r=0.88 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Panama | r=0.7 | 10yrs | No |
| How nerdy AsapSCIENCE YouTube video titles are | r=0.66 | 11yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Honduras | r=0.66 | 10yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=0.63 | 10yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'florida man' meme | r=0.57 | 15yrs | No |
| Butter consumption | r=0.56 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age | r=0.55 | 17yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on alcoholic beverages | r=0.55 | 18yrs | No |
| The distance between Mars and Earth | r=0.5 | 18yrs | No |
Global Permanent Nuclear Reactor Shutdowns also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)