Report an error
Popularity of the first name Alonzo correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total NBA League Revenue | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Average temperature in Miami | r=0.82 | 48yrs | No |
Average temperature in Berlin | r=0.69 | 48yrs | No |
Formula One World Drivers' Champion's Point Margin | r=0.65 | 48yrs | Yes! |
Hot days in Berlin | r=0.61 | 39yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alonzo also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)