Report an error
Average Cost of a 30-Second Ad Commercial during the Academy Awards correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Alabama | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
Global Rice Consumption | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emilio | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
US GDP per capita | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
M&T Bank's stock price (MTB) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Valero Energy's stock price (VLO) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | Yes! |
US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on housing | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on transportation | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
Corning's stock price (GLW) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on alcoholic beverages | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
Average Cost of a 30-Second Ad Commercial during the Academy Awards also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)