Report an error
Popularity of the first name Phoebe correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.98 | 43yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.97 | 44yrs | No |
Air quality in Oxnard, California | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
Chipotle Mexican Grill's stock price (CMG) | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.94 | 27yrs | No |
UFO sightings in New Jersey | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.89 | 12yrs | No |
The number of aerospace engineers in Utah | r=0.85 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.83 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Phoebe also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)