Report an error
Popularity of the first name Leo correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Total wind power generated globally | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in United Kingdom | r=0.99 | 34yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in France | r=0.99 | 29yrs | No |
| The number of pharmacists in California | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Number of websites on the internet | r=0.98 | 28yrs | Yes! |
| Restaurant spending in Kansas | r=0.97 | 24yrs | No |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Google's annual advertising revenue | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| Google's Advertising Revenue | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Leo also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)