Report an error
Popularity of the first name Iris correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Renewable energy production in China | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
Milk-fat consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
Nasdaq's stock price (NDAQ) | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America | r=0.92 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Iris also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)