Report an error
Total U.S. grain export volume correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Republican Senators in Illinois | r=0.94 | 7yrs | No |
How clickbait-y LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Qatar | r=0.87 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation | r=0.8 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in journalism | r=0.73 | 10yrs | No |
Total U.S. grain export volume also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)