Report an error
Popularity of the first name Tamia correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Patents granted to Toshiba | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of telemarketers in California | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of switchboard operators in Indiana | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| United States music album sales | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Idaho | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in North Carolina | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Nevada | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Texas | r=0.87 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Tamia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)