Report an error
Popularity of the first name Eliza correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Electricity generation in Senegal | r=1 | 42yrs | No |
| Total renewable energy production globally | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
| American cheese consumption | r=0.97 | 32yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Music and dance | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in Sri Lanka | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System | r=0.96 | 48yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme | r=0.82 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Eliza also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)