Report an error
Popularity of the first name Frances correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Solar power generated in Kiribati | r=0.99 | 17yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Philippines | r=0.99 | 17yrs | No |
| Amazon's shipping revenue in millions of dollars | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'smol' | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
| Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
| The number of authors in Utah | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Samoa | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'reddit' | r=0.94 | 15yrs | No |
| Average length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with American Airlines | r=0.91 | 28yrs | No |
| US Wind Power Generation Capacity | r=0.87 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Frances also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)