Report an error
Popularity of the first name Nora correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Fossil fuel use in Burkina Faso | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Canada | r=0.99 | 30yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Pakistan | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Burkina Faso | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Romania | r=0.98 | 30yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
US dairy skim solids used to produce cheese (other than cottage cheese) | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
US production of cheese (other than cottage cheese) | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
US Shoe Store Sales | r=0.96 | 30yrs | No |
Robberies in North Dakota | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System | r=0.95 | 48yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.92 | 46yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA | r=0.9 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nora also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)