Report an error
Popularity of the first name Jaden correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in literature | r=1 | 10yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in literature | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of computer programmers in Michigan | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'desktop background' | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Lithuania | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
| Ticket sales for New York Yankees games | r=0.88 | 44yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Tallahassee | r=0.86 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jaden also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)