Report an error
Popularity of the first name Alice correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
China's Annual Passenger Car Production | r=0.99 | 18yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Sudan | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Niger | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New York | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Minnesota | r=0.98 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Czechia | r=0.97 | 29yrs | No |
Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Total Revenue of the NFL Teams | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
US production of cheese (other than cottage cheese) | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
US milk fat used to produce yogurt | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
The number of phlebotomists in Florida | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Global revenue generated by Unilever Group | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alice also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)