Report an error
Popularity of the first name Brody correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of executive administrative assistants in Ohio | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Yemen | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.92 | 37yrs | No |
Devon Energy's stock price (DVN) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
POSCO Holdings' stock price (PKX) | r=0.86 | 21yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in New York | r=0.85 | 47yrs | No |
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A) | r=0.82 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR) | r=0.82 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Brody also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)