Report an error
Popularity of the first name Sage correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
| American cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
| United Rentals' stock price (URI) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Costco Wholesale's stock price (COST) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Median US Household Income | r=0.94 | 32yrs | No |
| USA Population | r=0.92 | 48yrs | No |
| Electronic Arts' stock price (EA) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
| Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.91 | 27yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sage also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)