Report an error
Popularity of the first name Ivy correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total wind power generated globally | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
The Hershey Company's stock price (HSY) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
SAP SE's stock price (SAP) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ivy also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)