Report an error
Popularity of the first name Aliyah correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of childcare workers in Alabama | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Saint Lucia | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Saint Lucia | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Egypt | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Barbados | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in El Salvador | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
UFO sightings in California | r=0.94 | 46yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.92 | 44yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.91 | 43yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.88 | 34yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.86 | 45yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Aliyah also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)