Report an error
Annual comic book sales in North America correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of veterinarians in Massachusetts | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
The number of respiratory therapists in Mississippi | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Amazon's Annual Outbound Shipping Expenditure in Millions | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Daphne | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Egypt | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
US Shoe Store Sales | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sylvia | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Inflation in the US | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Rain in Paris | r=0.82 | 15yrs | No |
Annual comic book sales in North America also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)