Report an error
Total value of all $100 bills printed correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total length of Deep Look YouTube videos | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
Points scored by the Los Angeles Chargers | r=0.76 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'aint nobody got time for that' meme | r=0.75 | 17yrs | No |
Total value of all $100 bills printed also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)