Report an error
Average SAT score in writing correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Biomass power generated in Lebanon | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Hydopower energy generated in Turkmenistan | r=0.98 | 16yrs | No |
| Intercountry adoptions | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
| Annual book sales in the US | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme | r=0.92 | 17yrs | No |
| Google searches for '3Blue1Brown' | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
| Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'white house hotline' | r=0.88 | 17yrs | No |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Georgia | r=0.85 | 6yrs | No |
| The number of school teachers in New York | r=0.69 | 13yrs | No |
Average SAT score in writing also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
