Report an error
Number of Mr Beast videos published correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of heat treating equipment setters, operators, and tenders, metal and plastic in Minnesota | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
The number of food service managers in New Hampshire | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
The number of graphic designers in Guam | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
The number of geoscientists in New Mexico | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abel | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
Air quality in Albuquerque | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Titus | r=0.85 | 11yrs | No |
The number of shampooers in Massachusetts | r=0.81 | 10yrs | No |
Annual sales of the U.S. auto industry | r=0.79 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme | r=0.77 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'leeroy jenkins' meme | r=0.76 | 12yrs | No |
US kids in public school | r=0.74 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'the dress black blue white gold' meme | r=0.64 | 12yrs | No |
Number of Mr Beast videos published also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)