Report an error
Patents granted to Kia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Portion of all US dairy skim-solids allocated to the production of whey products (net) | r=1 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Number of times Garfield eats lasagna in his comic strip | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Arson in North Dakota | r=0.81 | 11yrs | No |
Drenching rain in Phoenix | r=0.8 | 11yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Georgia | r=0.78 | 11yrs | No |
Snowfall in Chicago | r=0.69 | 10yrs | No |
The distance between the moon and Earth | r=-0.46 | 11yrs | No |
Patents granted to Kia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)