Additional Info: All headline and summary text from Bloomberg articles by Matt Levine included
Report an error
Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg.com correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of database administrators in Massachusetts | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'bad luck brian' meme | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Barclays' stock price (BCS) | r=0.86 | 10yrs | No |
Boston Celtics' NBA season loss count | r=0.8 | 9yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by General Motors | r=0.58 | 9yrs | No |
Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg.com also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)