Additional Info: All headline and summary text from Bloomberg articles by Matt Levine included
Report an error
Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Tuesdays correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Snowy days in New York | r=0.92 | 9yrs | No |
Barclays' stock price (BCS) | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=0.88 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how much wood can a woodchuck chuck' | r=0.85 | 10yrs | No |
Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Tuesdays also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)