Additional Info: All headline and summary text from Bloomberg articles by Matt Levine included
Report an error
Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Mondays correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'slenderman' meme | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Vodafone Group's stock price (VOD) | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft's stock price (DB) | r=0.94 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'overly attached girlfriend' meme | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
Boston Celtics' NBA season loss count | r=0.91 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'doge' meme | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
Snowfall in Washington, D.C. | r=0.83 | 10yrs | No |
Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Mondays also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)