Additional Info: Pompeii (2014); The Death & Life of John F. Donovan (2019); Game of Thrones The IMAX Experience (2015); National Theatre Live: Henry V (2022); Lot No. 249 (2023); Testament of Youth (2014); 7 Days in Hell (2015); Spooks: The Greater Good (2015); Baby Ruby (2023); Blood for Dust (2023); Game of Thrones: The Last Watch (2019); Marvel Studios Assembled: The Making of Eternals (2022); Brimstone (2016); Zog (2018); Silent Hill: Revelation 3D (2012); Seventh Son (2014); How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World (2019); How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2014); Eternals (2021); Friends: The Reunion (2021)
Report an error
The number of movies Kit Harington appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Snowfall in Chicago | r=0.82 | 7yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Mack Trucks | r=0.82 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marla | r=0.7 | 11yrs | No |
The number of movies Kit Harington appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)