Additional Info: An Education (2009); Never Let Me Go (2010); Far from the Madding Crowd (2015); National Theatre Live: Skylight (2014); Suffragette (2015); Mudbound (2017); A Christmas Carol (2020); Promising Young Woman (2020); The Dig (2021); She Said (2022); Carey Mulligan Knows the Secret to Being a True New Yorker (2015); Drive (2011); Northanger Abbey (2007); Shame (2011); Inside Llewyn Davis (2013); Wildlife (2018); Mamma Mia! Here We Go Yet Again (2019); Maestro (2023); The Greatest (2009); The Great Gatsby (2013); The 50 Greatest Television Dramas (2007); My Boy Jack (2007); Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps (2010); Blood on Benefits (2007); Inside 'Inside Llewyn Davis' (2014); Letters Live from the Archive: Freemasons’ Hall (2021); Pride & Prejudice (2005); Saltburn (2023); Slapper (2008); Brothers (2009); When Did You Last See Your Father? (2007); Miranda: My Such Fun Celebration (2020); Public Enemies (2009)
Report an error
The number of movies Carey Mulligan appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The distance between the moon and the Sun | r=0.46 | 19yrs | No |
The number of movies Carey Mulligan appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)