Additional Info: Anabel (2015); Blind Alley (2011); Ánima (2011); What's for Dessert? (2009); Corazón (2018); Blonde (2022); Entering Red (2019); Sex, Party and Lies (2009); For a Handful of Kisses (2014); Exposed (2016); A Rose from France (2006); The Lost Eden (2007); Perrito Chino (2012); The Night Clerk (2020); Deep Water (2022); Sergio (2020); Ghosted (2023); War Dogs (2016); Madrigal (2007); Blade Runner 2049 (2017); Overdrive (2017); Knock Knock (2015); Knives Out (2019); The Gray Man (2022); Designing Bond (2021); The Informer (2019); Wasp Network (2020); Hands of Stone (2016); No Time to Die (2021); Faraday (2013); Being James Bond (2021)
Report an error
The number of movies Ana de Armas appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of animal scientists in Nebraska | r=0.85 | 17yrs | No |
The number of marriage therapists in Connecticut | r=0.84 | 17yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in British Virgin Islands | r=0.8 | 12yrs | No |
The number of movies Ana de Armas appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)