Additional Info: Ballet Shoes (2008); Colonia (2015); Beauty and the Beast (2017); The Circle (2017); Prada Paradoxe (2022); Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (2010); Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 (2011); The Bling Ring (2013); The Perks of Being a Wallflower (2012); Regression (2015); When Harry Left Hogwarts (2011); Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005); Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007); Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009); Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004); Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002); Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001); The Tale of Despereaux (2008); 50 Greatest Harry Potter Moments (2011); Little Women (2019); Harry Potter 20th Anniversary: Return to Hogwarts (2022); The Children's Party at the Palace (2006); Pickled (2022); The Magic Touch of Harry Potter (2004); Daniel Radcliffe: Being Harry Potter (2012); Noah (2014); An Audience with Adele (2021); This Is the End (2013); (K)nox: The Rob Knox Story (2021); David Holmes: The Boy Who Lived (2023); My Week with Marilyn (2011); Howard (2018)
Report an error
The number of movies Emma Watson appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Michigan | r=0.91 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Votes for Republican Senators in Tennessee | r=0.91 | 6yrs | No |
Global shipwrecks | r=0.69 | 14yrs | No |
Rain in Sydney | r=0.6 | 19yrs | No |
The number of hotel managers in District of Columbia | r=0.6 | 20yrs | No |
Average temperature in Perth | r=0.59 | 19yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with Visibility | r=0.52 | 22yrs | No |
The distance between Mars and Earth | r=0.5 | 23yrs | No |
The number of movies Emma Watson appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)