Report an error
Popularity of the first name Emilio correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.98 | 47yrs | No |
| Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Jersey | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
| Renewable energy production in Chile | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'roblox' | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
| Average Cost of a 30-Second Ad Commercial during the Academy Awards | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
| Bank of Montreal's stock price (BMO) | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emilio also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)