Additional Info: Buster's Mal Heart (2017); Project X (2016); Rami Malek: Becoming Freddie (2019); Bohemian Rhapsody: Recreating Live Aid (2019); Bohemian Rhapsody (2018); Papillon (2017); The Little Things (2021); The Ben Cobb Show (2020); The Sound of 007 (2022); 'Tis the Season: The Holidays on Screen (2022); Da Sweet Blood of Jesus (2014); No Time to Die (2021); The Master (2012); Short Term 12 (2013); The Show Must Go On: The Queen + Adam Lambert Story (2020); Need for Speed (2014); Short Term 12: Behind the Scenes (2014); Amsterdam (2022); Dolittle (2020); Oppenheimer (2023); Designing Bond (2021); Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb (2014); Night at the Museum (2006); Oldboy (2013); Larry Crowne (2011); Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian (2009); Ain't Them Bodies Saints (2013); Battleship (2012); The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 (2012); Being James Bond (2021)
Report an error
The number of movies Rami Malek appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in Paducah, Kentucky | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
The number of actuaries in Connecticut | r=0.79 | 17yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' | r=0.66 | 18yrs | No |
The number of movies Rami Malek appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)