Report an error
Popularity of the first name Sofia correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.98 | 32yrs | No |
| Number of internet users | r=0.98 | 24yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'google' | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Trinidad and Tobago | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
| Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of sales managers in Minnesota | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.95 | 47yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.95 | 44yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.94 | 34yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Colorado | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Minnesota | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
| Air quality in Washington, D.C. | r=0.91 | 43yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Oregon | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'doge' meme | r=0.82 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sofia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)