Additional Info: The Lovely Bones (2009); Mary Queen of Scots (2018); City of Ember (2008); Hanna (2011); The Host (2013); Violet & Daisy (2011); Justin and the Knights of Valour (2013); How I Live Now (2013); Brooklyn (2015); Stockholm, Pennsylvania (2015); On Chesil Beach (2018); Lady Bird (2017); Little Women (2019); Foe (2023); The Tragedy of Macbeth (2021); Byzantium (2012); The Seagull (2018); Ammonite (2020); See How They Run (2022); Atonement (2007); I Could Never Be Your Woman (2007); The Way Back (2010); Lost River (2015); Death Defying Acts (2007); The Christmas Miracle of Jonathan Toomey (2007); Weepah Way For Now (2015); Loving Vincent (2017); Great Performers: Horror Show (2017); Electric Burma: The Concert for Aung San Suu Kyi - Words I Never Said (2016); The Making of The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014); The Grand Budapest Hotel (2014); Loving Vincent: The Impossible Dream (2019); Muppets Most Wanted (2014); The French Dispatch (2021)
Report an error
The number of movies Saoirse Ronan appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
Air pollution in Raleigh, North Carolina | r=0.9 | 6yrs | No |
The number of movies Saoirse Ronan appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)