Additional Info: The Secret Life of Bees (2008); Charlotte's Web (2006); Coraline (2009); Hounddog (2007); Viena and the Fantomes (2020); Very Good Girls (2013); Now Is Good (2012); Effie Gray (2014); The Last of Robin Hood (2013); The Benefactor (2015); Celia (2012); Please Stand By (2018); Father Xmas (2001); Zygote (2017); Sweetness in the Belly (2019); War of the Worlds (2005); The Cat in the Hat (2003); Cutlass (2007); Hide and Seek (2005); Dreamer: Inspired By a True Story (2005); The Runaways (2010); Push (2009); Uptown Girls (2003); Night Moves (2014); Yellowbird (2014); Brimstone (2016); The Escape (2016); Man on Fire (2004); Lilo & Stitch 2: Stitch Has a Glitch (2005); Oats Studios: Volume 1 (2021); Coraline: Creepy Coraline (2009); The Equalizer 3 (2023); In the Realms of the Unreal (2004); The Motel Life (2013); Every Secret Thing (2014); American Pastoral (2016); Penn & Teller: Try This at Home (2020); I Am Sam (2001); Winged Creatures (2009); The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009); The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (2010); Trapped (2002); Coraline: The Making of 'Coraline' (2009); Rise (2011); Nine Lives (2005); Hansel & Gretel (2002); Kim Possible: A Sitch In Time (2003); Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood (2019); Vengeance Is Mine: Reinventing 'Man on Fire' (2005); The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 (2012); Ocean's Eight (2018); Sweet Home Alabama (2002); Tomcats (2001)
Report an error
The number of movies Dakota Fanning appeared in correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Votes for Republican Senators in Wisconsin | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
| How professional-sounding OverSimplified YouTube video titles are | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
| The number of nursing assistants in Delaware | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
| Total likes of Casually Explained YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 9yrs | No |
| The number of special education teachers in Minnesota | r=0.84 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Brexit' | r=0.77 | 8yrs | No |
| The number of nursing assistants in Ohio | r=0.75 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of exercise physiologists in Louisiana | r=0.75 | 11yrs | No |
| Votes for Republican Senators in Wisconsin | r=0.74 | 6yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'balloon boy' meme | r=0.71 | 15yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Netherlands | r=0.61 | 22yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' | r=0.59 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'xbox' | r=0.54 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'shook' | r=0.45 | 20yrs | No |
The number of movies Dakota Fanning appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)