Additional Info: The Strangers (2008); Stealing Beauty (1996); The Incredible Hulk (2008); One Night at McCool's (2001); Onegin (1999); Inventing the Abbotts (1997); The Ledge (2011); Robot & Frank (2012); Wildling (2018); Plunkett & MacLeane (1999); Heavy (1995); Lonesome Jim (2005); Cookie's Fortune (1999); Jersey Girl (2004); That Thing You Do! (1996); Super (2010); Smother (2008); Space Station 76 (2014); Armageddon (1998); Reign Over Me (2007); Ad Astra (2019); The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001); Silent Fall (1994); Dr. T & the Women (2000); Quest for the Ring (2001); Ringers: Lord of the Fans (2005); Empire Records (1995); Jamie Marks Is Dead (2014); Mademoiselle C (2013); The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003); The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002); A Passage to Middle-earth: Making of 'Lord of the Rings' (2001); Beyond the Movie: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001); U Turn (1997); Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy (2010)
Report an error
The number of movies Liv Tyler appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in New York | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
The number of hearing aid specialists in Texas | r=0.84 | 8yrs | No |
The number of movies Liv Tyler appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)